| | | | | | | |
TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY Memorandum | |
| | | | | | | | To: | Board of Directors | From: | Madilyn Jacobsen, Transportation Planner | Meeting Date: | January 22, 2020 | Subject: | Summary of 2019 Environmental Document Review Program |
| |
| | | | | | | | RECOMMENDED ACTION: | RECEIVE summary of environmental document reviews conducted by TAMC in 2019. |
| |
| | | | | | | | SUMMARY: | As part of the Transportation Agency's on-going work program, Staff reviews environmental documents to comment on land use, transportation, safety, and greenhouse gas emissions sections of general plan updates, bicycle plans, major development plans, transit plans and other environmental review documents prepared by local agencies and other entities. This report is a summary of completed actions from January - December 2019. |
| |
| | | | | | | | FINANCIAL IMPACT: | The environmental document review program is included in the approved Agency budget and funded by Rural Planning Assistance funds. |
| |
| | | | | | | | DISCUSSION: | To effectively plan for the county’s future transportation needs, the Transportation Agency is engaged in efforts to coordinate land use and transportation planning activities across the county. The goal of this coordination is to connect regional transportation infrastructure development with ongoing land use decision-making, thereby reducing the long-term need for costly regional infrastructure improvements. As more coordination occurs, such as building retail stores within walking distance of residential neighborhoods, less money will be needed to construct new roads and parking, allowing funds to be used on highway safety improvements and other regional projects. One of the Transportation Agency’s mechanisms for coordinating transportation and land use planning is through the environmental document review process as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff reviews plans and development proposals that are under consideration by the county’s jurisdictions pursuant to CEQA to identify new regional transportation impacts and recommend mitigation strategies. All comments are limited to those project activities that are within the agency’s area of expertise, or which are required to be carried out or approved by the agency.
During the 2019 year, staff reviewed ten environmental documents and provided comments on eight of the environmental documents. Comments submitted typical aligned with one or more of the following sentiments:
- Additional transportation safety enhancements should be added to the project;
- Impacts on regional roads and highways were underestimated; and/or
- Inclusion of transit, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure received support.
The following table summarizes the lead agency, project name, and type of environmental documents that staff provided comments on during 2019:
Lead Agency |
Project Name |
Document Type |
Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District |
Palo Corona Regional Park General Development Plan |
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration |
City of Pacific Grove |
American Tin Cannery Hotel Project Proposal |
Planned Development |
City of Seaside |
Seaside Campus Town Project |
Draft Environmental Impact Report |
Cal State Monterey Bay |
Master Plan |
Updated Notice of Preparation |
City of Salinas |
East Laurel Drive Pedestrian Improvement Project |
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration |
City of Salinas |
Rezoning / General Plan Amendment |
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
|
City of Salinas |
Salinas Airport Development Lease Project |
Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration |
City of King City |
Downtown Addition Specific Plan 2019 Amendments and two Development Projects |
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report |
|
| |
|